Image:A logo of Renren.com is seen during an expo in Beijing, November 3, 2009. Picture taken November 3, 2009. REUTERS/China Daily
By Elzio Barreto
HONG KONG (Reuters) – Chinese firms listed in New York are finding out the hard way that it’s easier to love global investors than leave them.
As dozens plan buyouts and a return home in search of higher valuations, companies that were once Wall Street’s darlings for the first time face the wrath of minority shareholders. Asset managers are publicly demanding better premiums, reflecting historical valuations and not 2015’s slide.
In deals collectively worth $40 billion, some 33 mainland China companies have unveiled plans this year to be taken private and delisted from the Unites States, according to Thomson Reuters data. But a cottage industry of hedge funds and lawyers is coalescing around those determined not to accept low-ball bids for their assets.
“We want to put as much pressure as possible,” said portfolio manager Lin Yang at FM Capital, a Britain-based hedge fund backed by the Libyan sovereign wealth fund that owns 1.4 percent of medical firm China Cord Blood Corp
“If no shareholder challenges the offer, it will go through on the cheap,” said Lin.
Peaking at a valuation of $615 million in August this year, China Cord Blood’s market capitalization has shrunk to just over $500 million; the bid was made in late April, valuing the target at $512 million.
There’s no deadline for the China Cord Blood buyout offer is and it’s unclear what the outcome will be; the company didn’t respond to email seeking comment. But minority investors have scored notable successes this year: In one case, Chinese investment firm Vast Profit Holdings raised by 34 percent a March buyout offer that initially valued dating service Jianyuan.com
The increasingly active culture of complaints may also leave a mark on future buyouts. Late last week e-commerce giant Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
“Listed issuers, before they consider whether to go private or be listed elsewhere, they must remember that at the end of the day, they have sought public funds. That means they must realize that minority shareholders should have a role to play in the business of the company,” said Michael Cheng, a consultant solicitor at law firm Andrew W Y Ng & Co and former research director at the Asian Corporate Governance Association in Hong Kong.
‘NEGATIVE PERCEPTION’
While Chinese companies may face a reckoning on home soil as the economy that accounts for much of their business slows to its weakest growth in 20 years, the tension over the ‘going private’ deals adds to general international shareholder unease over accounting and corporate governance issues in China.
“Investors will shun Chinese IPOs (in the United States) in the future. It just reinforces the negative perception” said John Romero, a Birmingham, Alabama-based hedge fund manager who has told the board of Renren Inc
Renren didn’t respond to email seeking comment on the matter.
Law firms such as Levi & Korsinsky LLP have started running their own checks on the fairness of buyout offers for Chinese companies including SORL Auto Parts Inc
Meanwhile a group of minority investors in E-Commerce China Dangdang Inc
Dangdang didn’t respond to email seeking comment on the matter.
“At this point, no material damage has been done,” said Kevin Lu, a San Francisco bay area investor in Dangdang who said he speaks on behalf of 120 shareholders including hedge funds and individual investors.
“If a deal is finalised at the current proposal, it’s a no-brainer – the buyer group will be sued.”
(Editing by Lisa Jucca and Kenneth Maxwell)
Copyright 2015 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.