BEIJING HITS BACK AT CRITICS, WARNS AGAINST ATTEMPTS TO UNDERMINE CHINA-PNG TIES
Chinese officials have strongly opposed attempts by “irrelevant parties” to draw “preconceived conclusions” that they claim are intended to smear China and undermine bilateral relations.
The Chinese Embassy in Papua New Guinea has responded to recent media reports regarding a suspected illegal military artillery shell, expressing full respect for the position of the Royal Papua New Guinea Constabulary (RPNGC) on the matter.
In a statement, the Embassy expressed confidence that the RPNGC would soon provide an objective report. The Embassy, however, explicitly condemned efforts by third parties to jump to conclusions, labeling them as malicious attempts to smear China and damage the China-PNG relationship.
Addressing the controversy, the Embassy emphasized that China adheres to strict firearm and explosives control laws, asserting that the export of a single artillery shell would be “simply impossible.” The statement clarified that it is a common practice for some Chinese businesspeople to display rendered-safe ordnance or ornaments in their homes or offices, believing these items ward off evil spirits and bring good luck. The Embassy noted that these ornamental items pose no danger and are widely available on e-commerce platforms.
Reaffirming its commitment to the rule of law, the Embassy stated that it consistently requires its citizens and enterprises abroad to abide by local regulations. They added that if any Chinese nationals or companies were involved in illegal activities, China stands ready to cooperate fully with the RPNGC to investigate and combat such actions.
However, Police Commissioner, David Manning yesterday confirmed in a statement that the object in question is a military projectile.
“The round was examined by RPNGC Bomb Unit and PNGDF Explosive Ordnance Disposal personnel, including through x-rays to confirm its structure,” Manning said.
“l must make it very clear that this is an ongoing investigation, that will run its course in its own time. It will not be driven or undermined by conjecture.”
